Wednesday, September 29, 2010

2 out of 3.

To explain the title, we have three parts to our Brit Lit Norton Anthology. And I can't believe it, but we've already moved on to the second part: The sixteenth century/Early seventeenth century. I think it was the amazing title that first attracted me, truly. I'm already enjoying the two assignments we've read from this book. First, I discovered my devotion to Sir, St. Thomas More. Yes, it's true that he ascended to sainthood in the early 1900s. Poor soul, he was martyred by King Henry the VIII because he was Catholic. Oops. Oh, well. He left us Utopia. And what a wonderful book it is. If ever you have a sudden need for inspiration or even just a simple social debate, read this treatise. I hate politics economics and debating about such things, but I love talking about society. In fact, our professor handed a basic list of Utopian/Dystopian literature and, as you can probably tell from this blog, some of my favorite books were on it.

We've also read recently some of the poetry of Sir Thomas Wyatt the Elder. I must say, the more I read, the more I liked him. Unfortunately, he seems to get rejected a lot. I shall include one of his poems at the end of the post. :)

I also had to read Peace Like a River by Leif Enger for Communications. Although I will hopefully include a longer summary and outline later (I have to give a speech on it anyhow), if you believe in belief, this is the book for you. It is all about faith and miracles and sacrifice and surviving on the edge with really nothing before you. It's a really good book. More on that later. To conclude....

Madam, withouten many words

Madam, withouten many words,
Once, I am sure, ye will or no.
And if ye will, then leave your bordes (jests)
And use your wit and show it so.

And with a beck ye shall me call.
And if of one that burneth alway
Ye have any pity at all,
Answer him fair with yea or nay.

If it be yea, I shall be fain.
If it be nay, friends as before.
Ye shall another man obtain,
And I mine own and yours no more.

Friday, September 10, 2010

Haven't Been Devout, Have I?

I know I haven't been devout. I apologize. Really. :0

But I would just like to say several things about college.

First, relating to a previously posted book: A Brave New World is the favorite book of our communications and critical thinking class. In this class, we basically discuss ideas and philosophies, mostly social. So far, we have discussed libertarianism, utilitarianism, Kant, and a couple other awesome ideas about Justice. But in every class we end up talking about an" ideal" society, like the one in New World. Actually, one of the chapters mentioned "The Ones Who Walked Away From Omelas"! I was very excited. Anyhow, as a member in our class once said, it seems like everything we talk about reminds us of New World! Which is definitive proof that A Brave New World is the dystopia to trump all other dystopias. Take that, 1984!!!


Also, I am currently involved (at least as much as I can be with play practice and all) with a little group called Souvenirs. Aka, we sit around drinking tea and reading each other poetry. When someone asks "Is that all you do?" I respond with, "Well, we poetry duel!" Which is totally true. We are the jedis of poetry. Actually, we've covered Shakespeare, Donne, Tennyson, Cummings*, Eliot, and next week is Frost! Sadly, I missed Cummings and Eliot. But I still memorized a Cummings poem just for fun. The Shakespeare week was possibly one of my favorites! We almost disbanded without reading Sonnet 116, but I solved that problem. One of the things that made me very happy, was that in my first 5 minutes, two guys started dueling out "To be or not to be," which I memorized like 2 years ago, and since one of them dropped out, I was able to finish it out in his place! It is a tribute to thinking fast. Souvenirs is so amazing, we are hosting an all day reading of Paradise Lost sometime this "winter" according to Claxton. Amazing group. And also, there are cute boys. Just sayin. :D

Thirdly, I am in Brit Lit, as you know which has turned out just to my expectations, though a little different of course than I imagined. Our teacher is Michael Claxton and he is so funny! If you ever catch the Bison from this month, read his article in the back about Twilight. We move so fast in that class. So far, we've covered general Medieval writings and history, Caedmon, Beowulf, Sir Gawain (my hero!) and the General Prolouge to the Canterbury tales as well as the Prolouge and tales of the Pardoner and the Wife of Bath - and I accidentally read half of the Miller's tale by mistake. I LOVE Sir Gawain and the Wife of Bath. Oh, and, did I mention? We are reading all of the Canterbury Tales in MIDDLE ENGLISH. Ok, it's not completely untranslated middle English, but it gives you what Claxton refers to as 'Footnote Whiplash.' I'm getting pretty good at it. Yep, it's exciting.

Well, that's about it, except for reading oodles for every other class. Currently, I'm also trying to read the Silmarillion, Watchman, and get my fill of Tennyson. Someone should tell me to slow down. Au Revoir!

Friday, July 9, 2010

OPENING K-NIGHT!

I am. Excited. Why? Because the theatre around the corner from my house ( www.theatrememphis.org ) is putting on a production of Much Ado About Nothing!!!! Aka, MAAN. This was my first high school play, actually, and it has remained my favorite Shakespearean Comedy. Ever. I still have my script. You have the eternal couple of Claudio and Hero, those starstruck lovers without the feuding families or death (well, almost). You also have the two famous bickerers: Benedick and Beatrice (!) who feud constantly and have to somehow be reigned in by the rest of the cast (any ideas???). You also have the plot of Don Pedro, the prince, bringing in his rebellious, conniving brother, Don John, whom he captured from a small coup that occurred immediately before Act I. Don John is determined to bring down his brother in all aspects of life. And plus, he's extra rebellious because he just got beat. All of these reasons, plus a pair of bumbling, drunk idiots for comical relief (as if we needed any) that just serve to get in the way but end up having the solutions to every problem!!! It's a great thing.

Plus, every film version of MAAN that I've seen (the Shakespeare: Retold (modern) version and the Kenneth Branaugh version) has been very well done and I've fallen in love with both. In fact, as soon as I heard about the production around the corner, I watched the Retold version in celebration!!!! Plus, in the Kenneth Branaugh version, it has Kenneth Branaugh (well, of course), Robert Sean Leonard (Dr. Wilson in House), AND Denzel Washington!!!!!!! WHAT!!!! He's awesome. He plays Don Pedro. LOVE. There is a nudish scene in the beginning, so beware, but besides for that, it's awesome!!!

In case you were wondering, I was the Messenger. Yeah, that's right. A girl playing a guy's part. Take that Shakespeare. It opens July 16! I'm excited.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

The Scarlet Pimpernel. Swoon.

Ok, This is less of great literature but while I'm procrastinating A Brave New World I'll write about a book that makes me swoon. The Scarlet Pimpernel!!!!! It's rather good! You see, I watched several film versions first which made me want to read the book which was provided to me by that little used book shop on Mt. Moriah (they are so sweet). Ian McKellan was in one of the versions! Shakespeare points! It was written in 1905 by Baroness Emma Orczy and it is practically timeless. The time period it is set in is French Revolution era (aka. The Bloody Revolution). It is the tale of a mysterious gentleman who rescues the French aristocrats who do not deserve death even though they are admittedly pompous and arrogant. Meanwhile, French native Marguerite, married to Sir Percy Blakeney, is having trust issues in her marriage. You will never guess who the Scarlet Pimpernel is!!!! This book is like the English version of the Three Musketeers - both are not very valuable as literature and both are good reads. Except the Three Musketeers will always be better. It's true. I love this book! It's a good, fast read. I give it 30 stars!!!

By the way, if the name "Scarlet Pimpernel" sounds familiar, and you don't quite know why, it's probably because Bugs Bunny did a parody called " The Scarlet Pumpernickle!!!"

Saturday, June 26, 2010

O Brave New World, That Has Such People In't!

1984 was good, but if you ever wanted a bit more Shakespeare in it, go for a Brave New World! Really, really good. Someone asked me to choose between it and 1984, and I couldn't. Because they are essentially the same thing but different and both equally well written. Wonderful Dystopias!!!
This is one of those novels with an awesome character list because each name has like 5 meanings!!! Maybe I exaggerate, but they are really awesome.

John Savage - (The most basic, simple name in the English language describing his character)(Explains itself)
Bernard Marx - (First name meaning Brave Bear, very ironic) (And Marx. Just Marx.)
Helmholtz Watson - (After "Herman von" who believed in science's civilizing powers) (a common Brit name)
Lenina Crowne - (After Lenin, the one and only) (She had something about her that acted as a "crown" and drew people to her)
Mustapha Mond - (After, I believe, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk - founder of the Republic of Turkey and Kemalism, which promotes secularism and scientific progress) (Mond is the root for the world?)
Fanny Crowne - Just a name that is ordinary, I think. Symbolizes the common masses?
Henry Foster - (Henry Ford, obviously) (William Z. was an American Marxist)
Linda - Means "pretty," which is ironic because eventually she is anything but, and it is one of the things she mourns
Popé - Indian leader in 1670ish. Like those uncivilized people, he mixed his indian beliefs with Christian ideaology.

That's it for characters! Yay!

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Yes! New look!

Sorry, the little tab at the top said "New options, want to try them out?" I just couldn't resist.

Alright. The Stranger....by Albert Camus. To be honest, I liked The Plague better. Well, que sera sera, it's a groundbreaking book. It is his first, after all. He also wrote "The Myth of Sisyphus" the same year. Well, you've heard my lectures on Camus and his absurdity and The Stranger is exactly the same. According to the back of the book, he was thrust into a "senseless murder." Does the word senseless sound familiar? Because it is absurd. This man does things like murder, love, attends his mother's funeral, makes promises, and all with a complete lack of feeling. Except perhaps towards the dog. But we'll get to that later. First, for a motif.

HEAT - While this guy was burying his mother, he kept mentioning the oppressive heat. They made the traditional walk from the nursing home to the church and it was hot. Very hot. There was this old man who, they said, was almost engaged to his mother despite their ages. He was very old and yet honored his mother enough to walk the distance. He cut corners of fields and struggled along, only to collapse at the church. According to the nurse, " She said, 'If you go slowly, you risk getting sunstroke. But if you go too fast, you work up a sweat and then catch a chill inside the church.' She was right. There was no way out." Also, on the beach, he killed a man because he got crazy with the heat, it seems. That was his defense and it says " The sun was the same as it had been the day I'd buried Maman, and like then, my forehead especially was hurting me, all the veins in it throbbing under the skin. It was this burning, which I couldn't stand anymore, that made me move forward." Interpret it how you will, it seems to be the impulsive burning of the senseless world when confronted with a decision: to mourn, which he didn't, to kill or move on, which he chose to kill. When he is moved to prison, he does not feel heat, and on the day of his trial, the entire room burns because another major decision is to be made: death or no death.

This novel is all about the Absurd Man, who is a STRANGER in the world. Stranger, get it? He gets used to everything and feels nothing. He turns to regular pursuits and feels no pleasure in them but does them because they are expected of him. He gets used to prison, for goodness sake.

2 things I want to touch on before I close this novel for good:
1. There was an old man at the apartments who had this old dog that he hated. After his wife died, he got a dog to kick around. Every evening they would go on a walk and kick and mumble and yell and swear up and down the street. Pobre perro. It ran away. The old man was distraught. He was lonely. He was used to his wife, he was used to his dog, and he missed the previous life simply because he was used to it. Just like Meursault got used to his life before prison and missed it. Simply because he was used to it.
2. Meursault, upon his trial and other circumstances, simply wanted over and over to explain himself, which he never really got an opportunity to do. The prosecutor and defense attorney gave their speeches and did their dance and probably got a drink after. But he never got a chance to defend himself. Camus likes to point out not only the senselessness of the universe but also the senselessness of the government, but more specifically, the justice system. Camus harped on it a lot during The Plague (the injustice of the justice system was part of the human plague).

Alright, as for a review? Recommendation? I really didn't like it. Want a real good overview of absurdist theory in something? Read The Plague (Le Peste) for a novel and The Guest (L'Hote) for a short story and The Myth of Sisyphus for an essay. And please read a short biography or context something before or after reading! It will make more sense! He was depressing for a reason!

Saturday, June 19, 2010

The Right Field.

Yes, very soon I will write reviews on The Stranger and The Scarlet Pimpernel (swoon) and I'm currently reading Searching for God Knows What by Donald Miller and A Brave New World. Remember Ceremony? I read the first four pages. I realized it was going to be exactly like Beloved. Blast. So I'm procrastinating reading it for now.

Anyhow, I realized the past couple days something which I've known for a bit now. Of course, I need to actually delve into the field, but now I know that I'm in the right field. The past couple days I've visited Harding University and have been visiting major seminar things and Honors College seminar things and drawing up my schedule. When I looked over the requirement sheet for Non-Licensure English Majors and looked over my requirements and the pick-four-classes-from-this-section section. I got excited. I will be taking Brit Lit this fall and of the four specialty classes I'll probably be taking Shakespeare! Literary Theory! British Novel! and this new class on Feminism/women in Literature from a professor who just defended her dissertation - which was a series of articles on Jane Austen. Yay! I'm so excited! And since I'm an Honors Scholar, we get to do (and actually are pretty required to do) these Honors Contract things that let us attend normal classes, but drop some of the more normal and mundane requirements in exchange for an extra paper or project that is of a different skill set or more suited to our field or something. That Shakespeare class is hereby CONTRACTED!!!! My new phrase. You like?

No, but I'm very excited. Actually, my "academic advisor" and I (she's a professor in my field - English) drew up my schedule for this fall, carefully avoiding some gen eds I might AP out of or take in an international program, and came up with a satisfactory schedule. Then she paused and said "You don't have any English. Do you want some English?" I said the equivalent of "Def Yes!" and dropped speech in favor of Brit Lit. I'm already starting my core requirements! The rest of my schedule includes intermediate Spanish, Communication/Critical Thinking, Honors New Testament, and and hour-and-a-half statistics class at 7:30 in the morning. But you know what? Since all of my other classes are on MWF, after that class and chapel on Tuesday and Thursday, I'm off scott free!!! To study, of course.